Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque Meters, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Meters, Velez Garcia-Nieto A, Isla-Tejera B
3 months) between the history browse day additionally the full publication go out. Using this type of pointers, journals should consider requesting article authors out of SRs so you can update its literary works lookup before allowed of your SRs. SR users must figure out the time slowdown amongst the last research go out of your own ratings in order for the data try up-to-date to own effective logical decision-and also make.
References
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz Grams: Clinical product reviews from inside the medical care a functional publication. Inside the. Cambridge: Cambridge College or university Force,; 2001: step 1 on the internet capital (148 p.).
Chalmers I. Section 24: having fun with scientific critiques and documents from lingering products getting scientific and you can ethical demo framework, keeping track of, and you may revealing. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, publishers. Clinical critiques inside the health care : meta-study from inside the perspective. 2nd ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper New jersey, Jones DR. Proof synthesis while the key to far more coherent and you may efficient research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:30.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Are logical product reviews upwards-to-big date in the course of guide? Syst Rev. 2013;2:thirty-six.
Palese A great, Coletti S, Dante Good. Guide overall performance among the many high impression grounds nursing publications last year: a beneficial retrospective research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi Yards, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Most of logical ratings authored into the highest-impression magazines didn’t check in the brand new protocols: a great meta-epidemiological studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;60.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen Yards, Elo S, Kyngas H. This new methodological quality of clinical studies had written inside the large-impact medical publications: a look at this new literary works. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):31532.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Exercises tools when you look at the facts depending habit: assessment regarding reusable reading items (RLOs) to own learning about meta-research. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Blowjob, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR is actually a reliable and you will valid aspect tool to evaluate the fresh new methodological quality of clinical reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski Meters, Vallve Odena M, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic A, Jeric M, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak M, Poklepovic Pericic T, mais aussi al. Methodological and you may revealing top-notch medical analysis had written in the high ranking periodicals in the field of problems. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The caliber of health-related reviews at your fingertips surgery: a diagnosis playing with AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Va, Sharif MO. An enthusiastic AMSTAR testing of your methodological top-notch clinical feedback away from oral health care treatments authored regarding diary out of applied oral science (JAOS). J Appl Dental Sci. 2011;19(5):440seven.
Medical recommendations and you can meta-analyses towards the psoriasis: character off financial support supplies, conflict interesting and you will bibliometric indices while the predictors away from methodological top quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):1633forty two.
Brandt JS, Downing Air conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Pass classics inside obstetrics and gynecology: this new 100 usually cited journal blogs during the last 50 many years. Was J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1eight.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Yards, Tam WW, Tang J. Distribution and you will epidemiological functions out of penned individual diligent analysis meta-analyses. PLoS That. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Endorsement out-of PRISMA report and you will top-notch clinical studies and you can meta-analyses had written in the breastfeeding guides: a corner-sectional research. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Blowjob, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers Meters, Andersson Letter, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai An excellent, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Additional recognition off a dimension tool to assess scientific product reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS You to. 2007;2(12):e1350.
